Skip links

2004 President

Sabato's Crystal Ball

A Grand Old Convention in the Big Ol’ Apple

Thinking back on this busy week, what worked and what didn’t at the GOP Convention? The Good The convention itself appeared better thought out and executed than the Boston conclave for the Democrats. Even the physical set was far more imposing, especially the final-night presidential platform and the Fred Thompson-narrated introductory video. The convention speakers mixed positive and negative messages well, for the most part; by contrast, the Democrats were oddly obsessed with muting the Bush-bashing that would have thrilled the activists and most of the people watching at home. Governor Arnold and Mayor Rudy gave superb addresses, and President Bush–not always a dependable public speaker–rose to the challenge, especially in the final quarter of his talk. The party also impressively communicated its central theme for Bush’s reelection: Bush is the leader for the war on terror and Kerry is not. Sept. 11 and the New York location provided overt and subconscious reinforcement. The Bad The protestors were a ready-made diversion for the news media, providing as they did a more immediate counterpoint to yet another scripted convention. While some demonstrators would have shown up anywhere, five-to-one Democratic New York was a nurturing environment for anti-Bush sentiments–and the Republicans asked

Larry J. Sabato

Low-Carb Convention Wrap

Make a list; check it twice With President Bush six votes shy of the 270 needed to win the Electoral College–and 24 votes ahead of John Kerry–in The Hotline’s White House Scoreboard, tonight’s speech may prove to be the moment that wins him reelection. Tonight is George W. Bush’s chance to define a second-term agenda and give substance to his theme of “compassionate conservatism.” He also must, to some degree, give justification for his policies and how they have served the American people. Lastly, he must differentiate himself from his Democratic challenger with reality, not rhetoric. Furthermore, if the president hopes to recapture some of the voters he’s lost since the Democratic primaries, he must convey a message that he’s trustworthy and sincere. As many Republican insiders have noted in the last two days, trust is something that is easy to lose and hard to regain. For those voters who see Bush as having misled the country into war on the premise of weapons of mass destruction in the hands of an unstable dictator, this could prove to be an insurmountable task for the president. But, if we ignore the predictions by Bush’s own campaign staff that he will spell

Peter Jackson

Big Apple Breakfast

Bush: You either love him or you hate him It’s proving to be a pretty divisive time in this political day and age with the number of undecided voters much smaller than usual, just two months out from Election Day. So it was no surprise last night then that retiring Georgia Senator Zell Miller, a Democrat playing in the biggest of Republican sandboxes, tugged on the strings of the GOP base and fired them up. His speech was very caustic, very inciting, and very revealing about the strategy that the GOP will be taking this fall to reelect their man to the highest office in the land. Here in New York, there is quite a dichotomy between the mood inside the convention hall and the one just outside of it. Inside, there are delegates, alternates, and invited guests wearing everything from diamond studded “W” lapel pins to large “W ’04” belt buckles. There was even an alternate wearing a George W. Bush zucchetto (zucchetto is the pope’s hat). Not that the partisans in Boston were any less creative–although I don’t recall any reports of John Kerry yarmulkes. The larger point is that not many people really love or hate the

Peter Jackson

VET-ting the 2004 Ballot

In theory, the 25 million-plus veterans in the United States represent a formidable voting bloc. History, however, has shown that veterans are not a monolithic coalition, largely because of the diversity of the members. With national security a major issue and a battle between a “war president” and a Vietnam War vet on the November ballot, will 2004 finally be the year when veterans unite? Probably not, even with the recent frenzy created by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth ads, since it has motivated veterans on both ends of the political spectrum. But that does not mean that the veteran vote lacks major significance for this election and future elections. Veterans’ issues have always interested me on a personal level. The most significant experience in my late father’s life was his four-year service during World War II. After training stateside, N.J. Sabato was stationed in Britain until D-Day, going into France, fighting in the Battle of the Bulge, and helping to liberate the German countryside from Hitler’s grasp. My most valued possession is an enormous Nazi flag that my father ripped down from one of Hitler’s favorite regional headquarters outside Berlin in April 1945. Like millions of baby boomers,

Larry J. Sabato

Republicans: It’s OK to vote for us

The GOP’s message for convention viewers this week has been very succinct: President Bush is the best candidate to lead the War on Terror. While the communications office here at the Republican National Convention has been telling the media each day has a theme–tonight’s was “People of Compassion”–if the focus of the election stays on terror, it will only benefit Bush. Last night, Senator John McCain and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani hammered on the terror issue and they are both very credible sources in the minds of the electorate. One is a war veteran who is seemingly able to rise above the partisan politics of the Beltway, and the other is the undisputed hero in the aftermath of the devastating attacks on the World Trade Center. Although Arnold Schwarzenegger’s credentials on national security are pithy in comparison, he too was able to capitalize on the issue and frame the War on Terror as a choice between the two candidates for president this fall in his speech tonight. Appealing to those voters who may have taken issue with the Republican platform, especially the GOP’s stance on certain social issues, Schwarzenegger said: “And maybe just maybe you don’t agree with

Peter Jackson

Low-Carb Convention Wrap

Or, should we call it “Low-Speed Convention Wrap” This Crystal Ball udpdate is coming to you live from the National Journal area in the Farley Building, adjacent to Madison Square Garden. In yet another move to make things hard on reporters, the convention folks have made Internet access a near impossibility if you don’t have a toll-free 800 number to dial. At the beginning of the week all the phones in the press filing center could dial local numbers for free. Aparently, that was a mistake and Verizon, the official telecommunications provider for the Republican National Convention, switched the phones to act like pay phones. Your Crystal Ball thought it was smart enough to make this work: use our calling card to make a local call. Oh contraire monfraire, Verizon is unfortunately unable to make that work for our computers. The round of problems we’ve reported from the Press Filing Center is not impacting most of the U.S.-based publications. National Journal, for example, was allocated 4,800 square feet of work space here in the Farley Building. And, rightly so–between the Hotline and Convention Daily, they are doing their fair share of work. But small independent publications like your Crystal Ball

Peter Jackson

Big Apple Breakfast

Protest Update: The Crystal Ball Can’t Get No Love Two incidents in the past few days have prompted the Crystal Ball to speak out about the protesters, or, if you will, protest the protesters. During the United for Peace and Justice rally on Sunday, as your Crystal Ball was exiting Madison Square Garden to grab a slice and take in all the city has to offer, the crowd on Seventh Ave. gave a resounding “boo!” Our jokes are hackneyed, indeed, but the Crystal Ball highly doubts that the gaggle of disapproving protesters could tell that we are in fact, the Crystal Ball. The second incident occurred just last night, as the Crystal Ball was making its way from the convention hall to our hotel–with a quick stop for ice cream, of course. Two young ladies yelled “Republicans: Go home!” While a member of the CB team had some choice words for the young New Yorkers, perhaps now is a good time to reaffirm our commitment to non-partisan analysis. The Crystal Ball is neither Republican or Democrat, nor Green, nor Libertarian. The only ideological stance we stake is that the future of American democracy depends on actively engaging young people, and

Peter Jackson

Low-Carb Convention Wrap

Twist and Shout Just as the Republicans did this July in Boston, the Democrats have setup a rapid response center to spin the news coming out of Madison Square Garden. A direct twist of the banner that hung above President Bush when he declared an end to hostilities aboard the USS Abraham on May 1, 2003, the Democrats established missionnotaccomplished.com. The team includes New York Senators Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton, New York Congressman Charles Rangel, Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack, and General Merrill McPeak. There’s even a banner in Times Square. But the effect of this group will barely be felt. Just like last month, the media know that this week is for the party holding the convention. As was argued last month, it’s all about the balloons, not the substance, or rather, lack of substance to the convention. Where Do They Get These Numbers? At a National Republican Senatorial Committee press conference this afternoon Chairman and Virginia Senator George Allen commented that “California has an opportunity to really be turning around” this year, referencing the race there between Senator Barbara Boxer and former Secretary of State Bill Jones. Allen also noted that Jones is only four points behind Boxer

Peter Jackson

The Big Elephant in the Big Apple

Presidential election history suggests several verities that might apply as the GOP convenes in New York City: 1. Incumbent presidents usually get a convention bounce that is smaller, often about half to two-thirds, of their less well-known challengers in the other party. Since John Kerry got a bounce estimated to be a mere two points overall–once all the major nonpartisan national surveys are averaged in the two weeks following the Democratic National Convention–this “rule” would predict that George W. Bush will gain a mere one point from New York! So why do we wonder whether history will be rewritten by the Republican Convention? It’s all just too pat and pre-packaged for our tastes. Yes, as it has been written a thousand times since Boston, there are few “undecideds” in 2004, so a bounce this year cannot be very large. This argument appears logical, but is it not also possible that Americans were not overly impressed with the Democratic conclave or with Kerry’s performance? Could it be, in retrospect, that even to untrained eyes, Kerry overdid his Vietnam service and left too many blanks about the rest of his life? Moreover, isn’t Bush having a mild semi-revival? Just about everyone agrees

Larry J. Sabato

Low-Carb Convention Wrap

May We Present the Republican Candidates for U.S. Senate While the focus of this week will be on President Bush, his first-term accomplishments and his plans for another, the Monday morning session showcased seven Republican candidates for Senate. After an introduction by National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) Chairman George Allen (R-VA), the candidates proceeded to deliver quick stump speeches sticking to this week’s talking points. Some highlights from the four candidates in the most contested races: Pete Coors (CO) – “I’ll be a voice for Colorado families for lower taxes and lower spending, a strong military and a growing economy that creates real opportunity for men and women throughout our state and our nation.” Jim Demint (SC) – “This convention is about building a better future and a great president who has proven that he has the courage and right ideas to take us there.” George Nethercutt (WA) – “We have brought economic growth…Medicare reform…a new Homeland Security Department…and we are now fighting terrorists on their won soil and not ours.” John Thune (SD) – “The common sense agenda of President Bush and our Senate Republican majority has been obstructed too long.” A senior Republican strategist has told the Crystal

Peter Jackson

Vietnam: Political Apocalypse Now

The extraordinary emotional exchanges we are witnessing daily about the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth group leads us to one unavoidable conclusion: For only the second time in our nation’s history, the bitterness of a bloody, lost war will shadow national politics until generational replacement has removed all the brave soldiers who experienced the event first-hand. The Civil War did not end until everyone who had fought in it had passed away–and then some. For over a century after Robert E. Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House, Americans were still arguing over the war’s name (the Civil War, the War Between the States, or the War of Northern Aggression). Even two wars we did not really win–the War of 1812 and the Korean War–never came close to generating such animosity. Much like the Civil War, the Vietnam War continues to roil our elections almost thirty years after the inglorious collapse of U.S.-supported South Vietnam. Arguably, Vietnam has already played a significant role in as many presidential elections as the Civil War ever did–at least in a headline sense. It was THE ISSUE in 1968 and 1972, but still mattered greatly in 1976 (the amnesty matter for those young men who

Larry J. Sabato

The McGreevey Matter

Now that we are all finished picking our jaws up off the floor after Governor Jim McGreevey’s one-of-a-kind press conference in New Jersey, it is worth taking stock of what this extraordinary development might mean for the 2004 race for president–in and out of the Garden State. McGreevey’s resignation speech was repeatedly called “courageous” on TV, and we are still chuckling over a cable news anchor’s instant analysis that the people of New Jersey would be so sympathetic that they would rise up and demand that he withdraw his resignation and serve out his term as a proud gay man. (Yep, she really said approximately that, in a “question” to the correspondent following the developments in Trenton!) A prominent print journalist also told us that in his big-city newsroom, gay and lesbian reporters stood and applauded as McGreevey joined The Cause, or appeared to. This is Deep Blue America’s reaction to McGreevey’s announcement, perhaps, but it is wildly unrepresentative of Red America, or even swing-state Purple America. Let’s get one thing “straight” from the beginning. This is not about gay rights. Some of our most conservative readers certainly will not agree, but we at the Crystal Ball believe that gay

Larry J. Sabato

Balloons and Confetti a Nominating Convention Make

Just five days ago, John Kerry’s pitch at Fenway Park didn’t make it past home plate, but his pitch last night to the Democratic National Convention was a home run. Your Crystal Ball will spare you the barrage of cliches reserved for the headlines of today’s newspapers, but Kerry was a bit eloquent and personal at a time when he needed to strike a chord with his viewers. It’s hard to imagine him flubbing this one–as we argued on Monday, Kerry had a 99.9 percent chance of succeeding last night. With a new Annenburg Public Policy Center poll showing equal favorable and unfavorable marks for Kerry among persuadable voters, the Massachusetts senator had to connect his life story and his vision for the country while making voters comfortable with him as president. He did just that by weaving a focus on national security with a promise that “our best days are still to come.” This is not to say that Kerry’s acceptance speech was the best thing since sliced bread. On stage Kerry looked a bit sweaty, his hand gestures a bit rigid, and his timing was a bit rushed. He even seemed a bit modest every time he raised

Peter Jackson

Boston Morning Tea

Does Edwards have Recipe for Success? Any American chef worth his or her salt knows what happens when you combine black eyed peas, a little bit of ham for flavor, some rice, and a few other ingredients. The result is a traditional Southern side-dish known as Hoppin’ John. Last night at the Democratic National Convention, it was a different kind of John who had the crowd hoppin’. John Edwards’s speech, which did have a measure of starchy substance alongside the warmth and flavor, brought the simmering Fleet Center crowd to a boil. Throw in a performance by Black Eyed Peas at the end, and you’ve got a recipe that had all of the delegations salivating, not just those south of the Mason-Dixon Line. The success of the VP nominee’s performance inside the convention hall is unquestioned. The success outside, however, is another story. Many have noted that his “Two Americas” theme is a striking contrast with Barack Obama’s “One America” speech on Tuesday. While Edwards certainly answered any questions about his desire to serve his country in the White House, he spent little time discussing his actual qualifications to hold the office. When compared to current VP Dick Cheney in

Matt Smyth

Low-Carb Convention Wrap

Get Comfortable and Settle in, as Minuteman Becomes Hour-Man According to a report published in National Journal’s Convention Daily, published each morning this week here in Boston, John Kerry’s Secret Service nickname is “Minuteman,” after the militia members in the Revolutionary War who were charged to be ready at a minute’s notice and who fought in the initial skirmish at Lexington. With his Thursday evening acceptance speech rumored to be in the 50-minute range, it might be time to select a substitute sobriquet. Kerry entered the Fleet Center after lunch today and took the stage for a brief walk-through and sound check, stopping to shake a few hands from the edge of the platform. When asked about the origins of his acceptance speech, Stephanie Cutter, the communications director for the Kerry-Edwards campaign, said, “He began discussing it well over a month ago, and has been working on it ever since.” While he’s had some help from various staffers and speechwriters, Kerry is the one who has been “putting pen to paper”–quite literally it seems, as the Massachusetts Senator apparently still prefers to write out his speeches in longhand. On the topic of length, Cutter compared Kerry’s speech to previous acceptance

Matt Smyth